Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2017 1:24:18 GMT
So I've been contemplating the place of magic within Fantasy fiction, and thought it'd be an interesting dicussion here at the House.
Now I'll be the first to admit I have not read nearly as much as I should, and I have a backlog of about 120+ books (primarily within the fantasy genre) to prove it. But so far I see three basic categories of fantasy novels:
A) Elder Fantasy
This is your very traditional fantasy, such as Lord of the Rings/Sword of Shannara/Sword of Truth series. You're going to have elves, you're going to have ancient secrets locked away by spells, and you are going to have Bloodline Magic Up The Ying-Yang.
B) Fantasy 2.0
This is where fantasy is still key to a world - but it's far less enigmatic. Magic is systemic; there is an actual system and logic to how it works. Here you'll have pretty much anything done by Brandon Sanderson/Kingkiller Chronicles/Lightbringer series. You will understand magic's cause and effect in these 'verses, even if, again, only select people can actually make use of it (hello, inescapable bloodline hand-waving).
C) Historical/War Fantasy
ASOIAF falls under this category, along with the Shadow Campaigns/First Law trilogy. These are series that are more rooted in our own cultural 'realism', and may even have portions based on true historical events. These are Magic-Lite fare, with magic being a minor part of the overall plot but connected in vital ways that are generally foreshadowed early, then left untouched before finally playing out in the final act.
There are many, many other fantasy subcategories, but I want to keep this generalized. What dosage of magic do you generally prefer in your fiction? Do you like the good ol' days when magic was all-powerful and rarely understood? Or do magic systems that have some sort of science or logic behind them low your hair back? Or, do you prefer more gritty realism in your reading, with just enough magic sprinkled in to keep it from being considered historical fiction?
Now I'll be the first to admit I have not read nearly as much as I should, and I have a backlog of about 120+ books (primarily within the fantasy genre) to prove it. But so far I see three basic categories of fantasy novels:
A) Elder Fantasy
This is your very traditional fantasy, such as Lord of the Rings/Sword of Shannara/Sword of Truth series. You're going to have elves, you're going to have ancient secrets locked away by spells, and you are going to have Bloodline Magic Up The Ying-Yang.
B) Fantasy 2.0
This is where fantasy is still key to a world - but it's far less enigmatic. Magic is systemic; there is an actual system and logic to how it works. Here you'll have pretty much anything done by Brandon Sanderson/Kingkiller Chronicles/Lightbringer series. You will understand magic's cause and effect in these 'verses, even if, again, only select people can actually make use of it (hello, inescapable bloodline hand-waving).
C) Historical/War Fantasy
ASOIAF falls under this category, along with the Shadow Campaigns/First Law trilogy. These are series that are more rooted in our own cultural 'realism', and may even have portions based on true historical events. These are Magic-Lite fare, with magic being a minor part of the overall plot but connected in vital ways that are generally foreshadowed early, then left untouched before finally playing out in the final act.
There are many, many other fantasy subcategories, but I want to keep this generalized. What dosage of magic do you generally prefer in your fiction? Do you like the good ol' days when magic was all-powerful and rarely understood? Or do magic systems that have some sort of science or logic behind them low your hair back? Or, do you prefer more gritty realism in your reading, with just enough magic sprinkled in to keep it from being considered historical fiction?